Sorry I'm late in posting this blog but time just seemed to run away with me this week.
Various apologies were given .
Thirteen members attended this week's session which was devoted to Nick's workshop on "How To Write A Novel" based on his Western novel "The $300 Man".
Nick explained that novels were like babies in that from tiny beings they grew and grew always being nurtured by the author.
(1) Plotlines - The plotline was usually the start of the novel in that the idea was conceived, not necessarily completed and nothing so hard and fast that it couldn't be changed or developed. Ideas should be jotted down immediately for future use but do not overplan everything - let the story develop naturally.
(2)Characters - There is no definitive way to create a character. Character names can be changed as the story develops but remember to change all references to it. One way to create authenticity to the character is to do a timeline which will provide background. Layering will provide more information to flesh out the individual. Minor characters should not be skimped upon if they are an integral part of the story. Determine the point of view of the character- is it omniscient or third person ( singular or plural)?
(3) Research - Always research your facts before, during and after your work. This will allow you to prove or disprove your ideas. Every thing can and should be checked- history, geography, use of names etc. as this will provide credence to your story.
(4) Vocabulary - Restrict the use of vernacular and accents as these may limit the reader's enjoyment. Avoid the use of "it" or "the" at the beginning of sentences or paragraphs Limit the use of certain words by finding alternatives.
(5) Scene Setting- Always move the story forward by describing the scene so that the reader can visualise whay is taking place. Make sure the reader is aware of scene changes by paragraph breaks etc.
These were the main points discussed by Nick and the mambers and whilst this workshop was based on novel writing it was agreed that the same should be applied to all types be they short stories, features or poetry.
Nick was thanked for the work he had done and the answers to the various questions posed to him.
Ian
This is the blog site for the Torrevieja Writers' Circle - a group of people meeting weekly to read, discuss and share their work of fiction, non-fiction, poetry and all genres of writing.
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Sunday, 18 September 2011
Focus on Feedback at Writer’s 14 September Meeting
The
mid-September meeting opened with a look at a recent Writing Magazine article, Under
the Microscope, where a published author - in this case James McCreet* - scrutinises
the first words of a new novel by an aspiring writer. The exercise generated
lots of discussion and heated feedback with everyone having an opinion. The
consensus, at the end of the session, was that good feedback on pieces read out
at the group is important and can help us evaluate our own writing and use of words -
making sure every word on the page carries weight.
Christina
queried whether people do actually say what they think when listening to
readings – she thought not.
Jane
demurred but said without being able to see hard copy difficult to deliver a
meaningful critique - feedback at best rather than criticism. Something for future discussion maybe?
At
the end of the day, it is of course up to the writer to take critiques in the
spirit in which they are given and to decide for themselves whether to accept
or reject them.
*James
McCreet is a British writer, the author of a series of Victorian detective
thrillers set in 1840s London. His works are known for their fast-paced,
historically accurate and complex plotlines featuring the same core characters.
Link for more information and his Top 10 Writing Tips. : http://www.jamesmccreet.co.uk
Subject
for the week was What Do I Do Now – Geoff kicked off with a poem ‘On Assembling
my Grand-daughter’s Hi-chair from Argos’. No criticism at all in fact piece
garnered unanimous applause with a 10 out of 10 rating!
Hard
Act to follow but Cathy gave us a take on the healing properties of Nature when
dealing with grief; Rosemary reviewed ‘An Unequal Music’ by Vikram Seth – a book
that had a very personal effect on her with its affirmation of the importance
of music.
Avril
wrote about an aquatic panto in which she was thrown into the limelight when
the White Rabbit – never mind his ‘I’m late, I’m late’ - went missing!
Newcomer
Betty – previously welcomed – read a ghost story, set in Cyprus, about the
raising of a ship-wrecked liner. We were reminded Editors and Publishers advise
avoidance of dreams, lottery wins etc. in submissions for publication.
So
that’s it from TWC for another week; Think worth recording as a footnote –
Private Eye, the witty and satirical magazine, is 50 next month and the
Guardian ran a great story last Monday – ending with a para from staffer Andy
Macqueen*.
‘The
end of The Eye will come when all politicians clean up their acts, when the
workings of Whitehall, the media, the justice system and everything in between become
entirely transparent, when the British lose their sense of humour and rediscover
the deference due to their elders and betters and a herd of Gloucestershire Old
Spots fill our airspace!’
A
great use of words to end this week’s blog.
Lisa.
Saturday, 17 September 2011
WRITING THE NOVEL workshop 21 September
Whether you write a romance or a western, a sci-fi or a horror novel, this workshop insight will offer you guidance on how to go about it. There isn’t a right way to write a novel – but there are plenty of wrong ways – and the latter contribute to the thousands of rejections that occur every day.
The idea is to read The $300 Man in a week. I’ve chosen this, as it’s a short novel. The only difference between this and longer novels is in the detail of description and the number of sub plots – longer novels tend to have more of both.
Agenda
Broadly, the workshop will cover:
Origin of the novel
Plotline – notes of 5pp provided
Character creation – listing of 9pp provided
Layering
Research
Character POV
Speech/dialogue
Setting the scene – and using sketches – 2 sketches provided
Beginnings of chapters and scenes
Words to avoid
Visualisation
Beginnings and endings
Symbolism, if any
Chapter headings
Synopsis
Blurb
Query letter
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
7th Septmeber 2011
Good to be back. I know this is quick and apols for any mistakes. I have visitors from tomorrow so needed to do this today.
Good to be back. I know this is quick and apols for any mistakes. I have visitors from tomorrow so needed to do this today.
John Edwards
chaired the group’s meeting today and started us off with a reminder of the
theme for this week, ‘Games’.
He also asked for agreement or suggestions about doing a
critique from the ‘Writers’ Magazine for next week that he had emailed to us
all. It was agreed during the meeting that the magazine piece should be looked
at first and if anyone wanted to bring their own piece of writing and offer it
for a group critique then that could happen too. There should be at least a copy to share if
not one for each attendee, to make notes from.
Members were asked to email any writing they wanted to be put forward
for a critique to the group.
Ian has completed the subscription to the ‘Writing’ Magazine
and this month’s should be with us soon for the groups to peruse.
TJ gave us an
account of his ‘Quiet Man’ exhibition in Ireland. The event drew a huge crowd and his
exhibition was held in the local pub used in the filming of “The Quiet
Man” Lots of interesting events,
including a John Wayne look alike, which TJ didn’t win, but he said that he was
glad he took prints of his artwork with him, as they proved to be very popular.
Margaret. I told
you all about my three ‘Open Mic’ sessions, which interesting me because it was
continuity in that it was good to hear such diverse and entertaining music
stories and poetry of other people. The venues were also amazing, usually
listeners and performers crammed in small rooms, but this did not detract from
the quality of the pieces performed.
It was agreed that those who had written on the theme should
read first.
Jane recounted
her experience of playing games when she and her husband Archie had recently
relocated to France. Her experience was
very revealing to say the least. We were
shocked, or pretended to be. We
eventually got a feel for the situation and understood Jane’s eagerness to leave. The whole group agreed that it was time for
Jane to publish her ‘French’ experience.
Many offers were made to Jane and we all seem determined that it should
happen at last. I do hope so Jane.
Ann reminded us
of our school days when we had to play games.
There was no escape then. There
were two schools of thought, you either liked games or you didn’t. Ann described vividly those goose-pimple
moments and the pressure we endured.
Avril stayed with
the theme of Games, First with a very short story about children in the Park.
The mother seen as a sister rather than mother. Her second piece was a rhymed
poem about games with the boys despite mum’s warning. A humorous piece. The group recommended slipping some words to
make the poem scan easier and perhaps looking at half rhyme.
Kathy read us a
piece as part of her group of stories with the same characters running
throughout. The game being a school
football match, where an own goal ruined the chances of one school team. This
piece raised some questions about the number of characters mentioned in one
short story and also about more action using concise accounts rather than
gathering momentum through character interaction outside the scene of the real
activity. Does that make sense
Kathy. I hope so.
Douglas delivered
an anecdote about an encounter in an hotel.
He called it the odd couple about a short sighted greedy Mediterranean
looking man with a very large bosomed partner who ate like an anorexic. They
were an enigmatic couple who drew attention to themselves unconsciously it
seemed. Douglas caught the mystery in
the story and gave us a haunting visual image of the man in the piece. It raised lots of questions. That was its
appeal. We were left wondering why they should be selling coins in the foyer,
but that’s all part of the mystery.
Jenny read two
short character study pieces. One about a homeless person and another about Karaoke
Kev. The group agreed that Jenny’s
writing is so concise, you are left with
a complete written piece, but the writing is so thought provoking, you
want to read more.
Rosemary’s written piece was in preparation for a
competition. The first 150 words of a
novel. The story began with a domestic
scene, where the use of utensils and the tone of the piece were key factors.
Suggestions were; change mushroom to carrot, more phallic and the dramatic
effect that cutting a vegetable could have.
Rosemary went away with some good ideas for change.
I read my ‘commended’ poem.
Me and the Deity. (I promise to not get too carried away, but I was
excited at the time!) The end was the
surprise as it often is. The other poem
was supposed to be humorous, again for competition. Based on the old dance number ‘Agadoo’ It was
suggested that it would be more surprising if the title was changed. A good
idea.
Some discussion took place about the format of the meeting.
Jane thanked John for giving everyone individually the opportunity to
contribute their thoughts about each piece.
John did say that he was very keen that feed back should be received as
it was always helpful.
Margaret
Friday, 2 September 2011
blog for 31/8/11
Ian opened by welcoming back Norma who told us that she had come to say adieu to those attending as she was leaving Spain for an indefinite period due to her husband's ill health. We wish her well and hope to see her if she returns.
Before getting down to this weeks hot pen, Brenda read a poem written on her rain sodden visit to Dublin which was very atmospheric and painted a vivid picture in the mind.
The buzz word for this week's hot pen was GONE. It never ceases to amaze how one little word can lead to so many interpretations.
Michael took us to an auction house where a Dresden dish went under the hammer- literally.
Brenda set her story in the prohibition era on the "going" of the boss man and the ensuing sibling rivalry on his successor.
John M then read about the sentiments of a husband followin his wife's leaving him for pastures new.
Norma told how her dreams of peaceful early retirement had gone by the diagnosis of her husbands motor neurone disease.
Jenny lighteneed the mood with a conversation piece between two girls in a bar and the 'moving on' of thee Lothario smoothie\who had gone and targeted another victim.
Mary didn't disappoint by producing two more amusing limericks on the theme. She seems to have been taken over by them as she toldd the group she's been composing them over the weekend.
Avril also had poetry about not looking back on past life which was gone but to look forward hopefully to the future. A lesson I could do to take on board Avriil/
Anne G wrote a conversaton piece betweek a husband and wife over a ruined Sunday dinner.
Jane wrote about a lady whose husband had left, the annoying thing being that he had pre-empted her own planned departure from an unhappy marriage.
Lisa wrote a very atmospheric piece about a day at the sseaside with Nanny- You've gone and done it now.
John read a moving poem about the last time a repatriated soldier will parade through Wootten Bassett as the government have decided to return casualties of war to Brize Norten.
Ian wrote on the hackneyed supermarket slogan 'Whe its gone its gone'. Makes you wonder who thinks these things up.
As all hot pens had been completed by half time, the second half dissolved into chaos. We each had to write three personal statements, two false and one true. Then again, was it two true and one false. The others had to then guess which was true/false. See what I mean- confusion reigned, but good fun though.
See you Wednesday next. Anne Grierson
Before getting down to this weeks hot pen, Brenda read a poem written on her rain sodden visit to Dublin which was very atmospheric and painted a vivid picture in the mind.
The buzz word for this week's hot pen was GONE. It never ceases to amaze how one little word can lead to so many interpretations.
Michael took us to an auction house where a Dresden dish went under the hammer- literally.
Brenda set her story in the prohibition era on the "going" of the boss man and the ensuing sibling rivalry on his successor.
John M then read about the sentiments of a husband followin his wife's leaving him for pastures new.
Norma told how her dreams of peaceful early retirement had gone by the diagnosis of her husbands motor neurone disease.
Jenny lighteneed the mood with a conversation piece between two girls in a bar and the 'moving on' of thee Lothario smoothie\who had gone and targeted another victim.
Mary didn't disappoint by producing two more amusing limericks on the theme. She seems to have been taken over by them as she toldd the group she's been composing them over the weekend.
Avril also had poetry about not looking back on past life which was gone but to look forward hopefully to the future. A lesson I could do to take on board Avriil/
Anne G wrote a conversaton piece betweek a husband and wife over a ruined Sunday dinner.
Jane wrote about a lady whose husband had left, the annoying thing being that he had pre-empted her own planned departure from an unhappy marriage.
Lisa wrote a very atmospheric piece about a day at the sseaside with Nanny- You've gone and done it now.
John read a moving poem about the last time a repatriated soldier will parade through Wootten Bassett as the government have decided to return casualties of war to Brize Norten.
Ian wrote on the hackneyed supermarket slogan 'Whe its gone its gone'. Makes you wonder who thinks these things up.
As all hot pens had been completed by half time, the second half dissolved into chaos. We each had to write three personal statements, two false and one true. Then again, was it two true and one false. The others had to then guess which was true/false. See what I mean- confusion reigned, but good fun though.
See you Wednesday next. Anne Grierson
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Wednesday 24th August 2011
16 members attended today's meeting, the theme being "The Secret of my Lack of Success".
Before reading her piece, Kathy warned of a web site, Fam Story, which advertises help to new writers on payment of E30. Fortunately, when she attempted to pay by Debit Card the transfer was refused, so no harm done.
She then read a piece in the first person detailing the list of failures which beset Colin, her character, who was one of life's losers. Just when he thinks he's finally cracked his jinx by surviving a plane crash, life once again deals a knockout blow.
Gerry read a critique he had received from a tutor group which inspired him to return to his book chronicling the cases of his DCI Farrell. Apparently the book is in an advanced state and as he has introduced members of the East European Mafia, Ian advised him to crack on while the subject was topical.
It really did sound a good read Gerry, we wish you every success.
Douglas read a piece set in 1971 when he and his family were posted from Mons to Berlin during the Cold War. His description of the car journey through the various checkpoints was very vivid. He hopes to have it included in a proposed anthology of servicemen's memoirs published by Penny Legg, "Under the Queen's Colours".
After the mid break, Ian reminded the group that we'd like to hear of any successes we had with having items published etc., which led to exciting news from John that he may well be engaged in a book signing event at a branch of Waterstones. Apparently the chain employ event managers to help promote new works and each branch has autonomy to make the decisions. John is also in touch with Penny Legg regarding his service memoirs and finds her very approachable. He then read his piece for today entitled "Never Again" about Jim, a 63year old serial philanderer, surveying the carnage wreaked on his patio left by his latest squeeze. SERVES HIM RIGHT.
Mary then read two limericks - Brush up your Shakespeare and To be or not to be. Very clever rhyming, Mary.
Avril then read about a boating trip to the Ise of Wight. She had invited a swimming coach friend of hers to accompany them, Joan who was about 18stone. Joan was definitely the hook for this tale as she went from one disaster to another. She could be the subject of a sitcom if you have any more tales Avril. a la MIRANDA.
Maureen's contribution this week was a short poem on the theme, which gave the impression that her children were as vociferous as mine with their opinions.
Jenny closed the show this week with a fantastic poem entitled "Trafalgar Square" which rattled along listing the people frequenting the square on a Saturday afternoon. It really conveyed the hustle and bustle of the busy tourist site.
Hot pen scheduled for next week, see you then. Anne Grierson
Before reading her piece, Kathy warned of a web site, Fam Story, which advertises help to new writers on payment of E30. Fortunately, when she attempted to pay by Debit Card the transfer was refused, so no harm done.
She then read a piece in the first person detailing the list of failures which beset Colin, her character, who was one of life's losers. Just when he thinks he's finally cracked his jinx by surviving a plane crash, life once again deals a knockout blow.
Gerry read a critique he had received from a tutor group which inspired him to return to his book chronicling the cases of his DCI Farrell. Apparently the book is in an advanced state and as he has introduced members of the East European Mafia, Ian advised him to crack on while the subject was topical.
It really did sound a good read Gerry, we wish you every success.
Douglas read a piece set in 1971 when he and his family were posted from Mons to Berlin during the Cold War. His description of the car journey through the various checkpoints was very vivid. He hopes to have it included in a proposed anthology of servicemen's memoirs published by Penny Legg, "Under the Queen's Colours".
After the mid break, Ian reminded the group that we'd like to hear of any successes we had with having items published etc., which led to exciting news from John that he may well be engaged in a book signing event at a branch of Waterstones. Apparently the chain employ event managers to help promote new works and each branch has autonomy to make the decisions. John is also in touch with Penny Legg regarding his service memoirs and finds her very approachable. He then read his piece for today entitled "Never Again" about Jim, a 63year old serial philanderer, surveying the carnage wreaked on his patio left by his latest squeeze. SERVES HIM RIGHT.
Mary then read two limericks - Brush up your Shakespeare and To be or not to be. Very clever rhyming, Mary.
Avril then read about a boating trip to the Ise of Wight. She had invited a swimming coach friend of hers to accompany them, Joan who was about 18stone. Joan was definitely the hook for this tale as she went from one disaster to another. She could be the subject of a sitcom if you have any more tales Avril. a la MIRANDA.
Maureen's contribution this week was a short poem on the theme, which gave the impression that her children were as vociferous as mine with their opinions.
Jenny closed the show this week with a fantastic poem entitled "Trafalgar Square" which rattled along listing the people frequenting the square on a Saturday afternoon. It really conveyed the hustle and bustle of the busy tourist site.
Hot pen scheduled for next week, see you then. Anne Grierson
Monday, 22 August 2011
PROSE BEFORE HOS!
The
subject for the week at Writer's was a a challenge set by Ian – to
write 500 words of prose! Interesting of a couple of counts – one
was the dearth of poets and the other was posited by a couple of
people – what IS prose anyway? Prose
is a type of writing that is termed ordinary. This is the style most
often used in newspapers, magazines, encyclopedias, letters and works
of biography and history; it derives from the Latin prosa which,
translated, means straightforward. Actually, everyone intrinsically
knew this but worth a check with www.answers.reference.com
And
this - from same site tho' credited to wiki.answers.com – answers
the next question – well, what about poetry then? 'The most basic
answer might be: prose is a language that has as its primary goal the
sharing of information. Poetry has as its primary goal the use of
language itself as music!'
If
grandmothers and eggs spring to mind ...well, think this is a lovely
description, much easier to understand than more high flown
explanations – so forgive me in the interest of those of us who
didn't know exactly! Of course there is also the prose poem ….
Ian
read first and gave us some prose and a poem! The latter 'My Favorite
Place' was followed by 'Cutting Edge'; both these pieces had twists
in the tale – and are to be included in a book that Ian is putting
together. 'Whistlers and Jugglers' - taken from a Waylon Jennings
song - will be about people and loss. Look forward to a publication
date, Ian!
Jenny
rose to the prose challenge with Hannah, Henry, James & John; a
neat little piece about the life of a nanny.
Mary
said she took up the challenge but lost!
John
delivered a review of Keith Richards' autobiography, 'Life' – that
he has lived with a capital L! For John the book answered many
questions that he, John, had been mentally carrying around since his
early introduction to the music of The Stones. An interesting and
well travelled journey that John says is 'a cracking good read!'
Brenda
also rose to the challenge with something new – an idea for a book
for children;we were introduced to a junior Fripp – by the name of
Fogle – one of the cave-dwelling Fripps, a one-eyed, hairy monster
who is going to have a series of adventures. We heard the first part
of the first story and meeting felt it important, in the first
instance, to determine age group that Fogle will be trying to
attract.
Michael
is continuing with his magic stones novel; he has written chapters
two and three and he read us Chapter two in which the stones begin to
be investigated!
Cathy
is also writing a book for children, this one about dragons. Cathy
edited the piece, from a longer one about dragonette nativity, for
the subject this week. Again, meeting felt it important that target
age range be determined.
Douglas
wrote a love story from a female pov and jolly good it was too!
So
there we are; short and sweet again! Seems like the temps may
moderate somewhat next week so hopefully our summer travellers will
start returning tho the stalwarts through a steamy (weather wise not
literary!) couple of months have certainly appreciated a slower pace
with more time to talk about each reading. But then of course, could
be the heat got to our brains …...
Keep writing. Lisa
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

